Comparison of Static Analysis Software Testing Tools (Thesis) (Record no. 64770)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01990nam a22001577a 4500
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number R/IMS-19
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--AUTHOR NAME
Personal name Bhatti, Naeem
-- 13-12-MS(IT)-12
-- Supervisor Dr. Rafia Naz Memon
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparison of Static Analysis Software Testing Tools (Thesis)
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 13-12-MS(IT)-12
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication Nawabshah:
Name of publisher QUEST,
Year of publication 2019.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Number of Pages 49p
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note ABSTRACT<br/><br/><br/>The software testing is necessary because during development process a lots of minor defects generate if these defects do not remove at early stage of software development life cycle (SDLC) then these minor defects become major defects and in the end software product will be failed. The software testing is divided into two major categories, static testing and dynamic testing. Static testing is done during verification process and dynamic testing is done during validation process. Verification and Validation are two measures used to check that the software product meets the requirements specifications. They help improve software quality. The focus of research is on static testing only, this testing is performed at first stage of development process. Static testing is done manually and through automated static analysis tools. It is evident from literature that less research of comparison of static analysis tools based on lexical analysis technique has yet been performed. The aim of this study is to identify specific vulnerability problems faced by programmers, developers and users such as wrong code, duplicate code, fussy code, unused variables, unnecessary object, class design problems, method design problems and check code layout. The two specific automated static analysis software testing tools are compared Check style and PMD. The goal of this research was to find out whether the selected tools are capable of finding the specific vulnerability problems present in the code or not.
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Department 0f Information technology
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://tinyurl.com/59feau4a
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Thesis and Dissertation
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Home library Current library Date acquired Accession Number Koha item type
    Research Section Research Section 01/07/2019 MP/43-495 Thesis and Dissertation
    Research Section Research Section 18/12/2023 MP53-655 Thesis and Dissertation