<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01488nam a22001457a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">64808</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">64805</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">R/IMS-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">15-MS(CS)-14</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Maria Pirzada</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">15MSCS14</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Supervisor - Dr. Adnan Ahmed Arain</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Performance Analysis Of Routing Protocols In An- HOC Networks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nawabshah:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Quest,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2019.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">26p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">






ABSTRACT

ln an ad-hoc network, routing protocols play an important role in providing packets with the minimum time from source to destination and in selecting  the best path  by using fever network resources between the nodes. The design of the routing protocol in any type of network  is an important issue in the MANET.  In modem  years,  attention  to
MANET has developed  due to the accessibility of wireless communication  devices that provide services at all times and everywhere. This research is based  on the simulation and detailed  analysis of MANET routing protocols  for DSDV (Destination  Sequence Distance Vector), AODV (Ad-Hoc On Demand Distance Vector) and GAF (Geographic Adaptive Fidelity). These routing protocols are analyzed by the delay, throughput and delivery ratio of metric parameters. To analyze performance, two scenarios have been used, such as different scalability  and different mobility  speeds. The result analysis suggested the best choice of routing protocol in different scenarios.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Department of Information Tewchnology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://tinyurl.com/r8hkba2z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">THESIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">QUESTCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RESEARCH</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-07-01</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">R/IMS-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">MP/42-466</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2019-07-01 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2019-07-01</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THESIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
